[lsb-discuss] Don't blame LSB and standards, please: was: Re: Fedora Plasma Product, feedback please

"Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" johannbg at gmail.com
Tue Apr 1 08:03:27 UTC 2014

On 04/01/2014 12:26 AM, Hohndel, Dirk wrote:
> On 3/31/14, 4:52 PM, ""Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"" <johannbg at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 03/31/2014 11:06 PM, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
>>> it generally doesn't result in changes that lead to
>>> unification, at least not as far as the big picture is concerned.
>> By now people should be aware of the changes taking place on the
>> core/baseOS level so if downstream distribution building upon the
>> components where the fragmentation is seizing to exist, like it or not,
>> admitting it or not the undisputed fact is those distributions are being
>> unified up to certain extent which honestly is not a bad thing, it truly
>> is a win win situation for everybody and the linux ecosystem in whole.
> SHOULD being the operative word.
> Following this email thread I find it encouraging how many things you
> are able to state as fact and out of the depth of knowledge that clearly
> shows your commitment to the process of standardization and the promise
> of active contribution.

If I'm going to be jumping on standardization bandwagon I will need to 
know how open LSB and linux foundation in general is to start coming up 
with a standardization model where each of the linux standards out there 
complement each other as opposed to compete against each other so we 
dont wind up with scenarios like this [¹].

Starting with adjusting the LSB specification to make it GENIVI*®* 
compliant so when you become LSB X.0 Certified you are also GENIVI 

The reason for this is obvious the traditional desktop/server 
distribution model as we come to know it through out the year are 
seizing to exist so distributions will either adapt to the emerging 
"smart" phone/tablet generation or risk becoming extinct in the process.

It's only a matter of time before Intel/Samsung <someone else> realize 
that there is a market opportunity/business case for completely tablet 
run or tabled controlled infrastructure a.k.a "smart infrastructure" 
which most likely would be built upon Tizen ( that is if they have not 
figured it our already ) so instead of risk having those standards grow 
apart we work towards making the necessary steps for them complement 
each other.


1. https://xkcd.com/927/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lsb-discuss/attachments/20140401/3bb00c54/attachment.html>

More information about the lsb-discuss mailing list