[lsb-discuss] Why python was chosen as a part of LSB?

R P Herrold herrold at owlriver.com
Mon Jun 9 21:19:39 UTC 2014

On Mon, 9 Jun 2014, Net Kgk wrote:

> Just googled this question and didn't find any sane explanation.
> So, why this poorly designed language was made a part of 
> LSB? In my opinion, such crapy technologies as python along 
> with system.d are ...

Starting a thread with: 
	'sane', 'crappy'
are supposed to draw ... what sort of reply?  And what part of 
an issued LSB spec presently mentions systemd?

-- Russ herrold

More information about the lsb-discuss mailing list