[lsb-discuss] Why python was chosen as a part of LSB?

Net Kgk netkgk at gmail.com
Mon Jun 9 21:27:49 UTC 2014


I was using "official" Linus Torwald's vocabulary, nothing more (just
kidding).
System.d was only mentioned as an example of poorly designed technology.
I don't believe in conspiracy, so I just want to know, why python is a part
of LSB.


On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 12:19 AM, R P Herrold <herrold at owlriver.com> wrote:

> On Mon, 9 Jun 2014, Net Kgk wrote:
>
> > Just googled this question and didn't find any sane explanation.
> >
> > So, why this poorly designed language was made a part of
> > LSB? In my opinion, such crapy technologies as python along
> > with system.d are ...
>
> Starting a thread with:
>         'sane', 'crappy'
> are supposed to draw ... what sort of reply?  And what part of
> an issued LSB spec presently mentions systemd?
>
> -- Russ herrold
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/lsb-discuss/attachments/20140610/a4c6e813/attachment.html>


More information about the lsb-discuss mailing list