[lsb-discuss] Why python was chosen as a part of LSB?
netkgk at gmail.com
Mon Jun 9 21:27:49 UTC 2014
I was using "official" Linus Torwald's vocabulary, nothing more (just
System.d was only mentioned as an example of poorly designed technology.
I don't believe in conspiracy, so I just want to know, why python is a part
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 12:19 AM, R P Herrold <herrold at owlriver.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Jun 2014, Net Kgk wrote:
> > Just googled this question and didn't find any sane explanation.
> > So, why this poorly designed language was made a part of
> > LSB? In my opinion, such crapy technologies as python along
> > with system.d are ...
> Starting a thread with:
> 'sane', 'crappy'
> are supposed to draw ... what sort of reply? And what part of
> an issued LSB spec presently mentions systemd?
> -- Russ herrold
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the lsb-discuss