[Lsb-infrastructure] Some additional DB support needed

[Vladimir Rubanov]

Yes, we'll certainly add this data into the DB. But this will be after LSB
3.2. It is not a blocker as I understand as the lists are manually prepared
now.

Vladimir.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: lsb-infrastructure-bounces at lists.linux-foundation.org [mailto:lsb-
> infrastructure-bounces at lists.linux-foundation.org] On Behalf Of Wichmann,
> Mats D
> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2007 2:08 AM
> To: lsb-infrastructure at lists.linux-foundation.org
> Subject: [Lsb-infrastructure] Some additional DB support needed
> 
> 
> It just dawned that both perl and python modules
> have a data list that should rightly be in the
> specdb, but there doesn't seem to be a really
> appropriate current home for it.
> 
> That would be a list of required modules for
> a conforming implementation, and needs to be
> shared among the specification, the language-
> specific appchk, and the language-specific
> runtime test (libchk equivalent, I guess).
> 
> Another possible datum to track would be a
> minimum interpreter version (e.g., perl has
> to be 5.8.8 or greater).
> 
> Mats
> 
> _______________________________________________
> lsb-infrastructure mailing list
> lsb-infrastructure at lists.linux-foundation.org
> https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/lsb-infrastructure