[Lsb-infrastructure] Private elements in Qt to possibly withdrawfrom LSB

[Vladimir Rubanov]

We would just delete these instantly. We will file a bug and prepare a
corresponding patch.

Vladimir.


> 
> > Mats, Jeff, what is the procedure for removing such "wrong"
> > interfaces from
> > the standard? May we just remove them by a "bug fix" or we should
> > still follow the deprecation cycle?
> 
> I insisted on a little bit of flexibility when the
> new deprecation policy was discussed.  If something is
> in the spec clearly in error it can be removed more
> rapidly, if we can make the case it doesn't impact
> anyone already certified.  I was strongly tempted to
> just remove matherr under this scheme, but with the
> new BinOnly setting, I'm resisting getting rid of it
> completely until 4.0.  Which case do you think would
> be more correct here - remove instantly or deprecate
> for just one cycle?
> 
> We need a bug for this one.