[Lsb-infrastructure] libchk changes: more than I expect
Wichmann, Mats D
mats.d.wichmann at intel.com
Mon Apr 28 08:27:45 PDT 2008
regenerating in libchk today after so far applying
only the patches from bugs 2058 and 2059 I'm finding
a lot more changes to libchk than I'd expect. This
may have come from an older change and I just hadn't
regenerated...
For example, libc_so_6.c, which had a large number
of #if defined __i386__, but didn't have the matching
stuff for the other architectures, is now missing
all of that.
Is this the expected result now?
More information about the lsb-infrastructure
mailing list