[Lsb-infrastructure] libchk changes: more than I expect

Denis Silakov silakov at ispras.ru
Tue Apr 29 00:59:14 PDT 2008


Wichmann, Mats D wrote:
> regenerating in libchk today after so far applying
> only the patches from bugs 2058 and 2059 I'm finding
> a lot more changes to libchk than I'd expect.  This
> may have come from an older change and I just hadn't
> regenerated...
>
> For example, libc_so_6.c, which had a large number
> of #if defined __i386__, but didn't have the matching
> stuff for the other architectures, is now missing
> all of that.
>
> Is this the expected result now?
>   

No, they are not. Neither total absence of checks nor the check for one
arch only are correct. This comes from incorrect grouping in one of the
queries in the mkfunclist script. To correct this:

sed -is/GROUP\ BY\ Iid/GROUP\ BY\ Iid\,AIarch/ mkfunclist

-- 
Regards,
Denis.



More information about the lsb-infrastructure mailing list