[Lsb-infrastructure] libchk changes: more than I expect

[Wichmann, Mats D]

Denis Silakov wrote:
> Wichmann, Mats D wrote:
>> regenerating in libchk today after so far applying
>> only the patches from bugs 2058 and 2059 I'm finding
>> a lot more changes to libchk than I'd expect.  This
>> may have come from an older change and I just hadn't regenerated...
>> 
>> For example, libc_so_6.c, which had a large number
>> of #if defined __i386__, but didn't have the matching
>> stuff for the other architectures, is now missing
>> all of that.
>> 
>> Is this the expected result now?
>> 
> 
> No, they are not. Neither total absence of checks nor the check for
> one arch only are correct. This comes from incorrect grouping in one
> of the queries in the mkfunclist script. To correct this:
> 
> sed -is/GROUP\ BY\ Iid/GROUP\ BY\ Iid\,AIarch/ mkfunclist

Almost missed this today; applied and libchk regenerated.