[Lsb-infrastructure] issues affecting autobuilds
Wichmann, Mats D
mats.d.wichmann at intel.com
Sun Jul 6 05:50:19 PDT 2008
Wichmann, Mats D wrote:
> 1. O_DIRECTORY and O_NOFOLLOW found to be arch-specific.
> I forgot to finish fixing this - I put in the differing
> values on ppc but didn't turn the formerly generic ones
> into arch-specific ones.
>
> This leads to:
>
> /opt/lsb/bin/lsbcc -g -Wall -Werror -c -o tetj.o tetj.c
> In file included from tetj.c:44:
> /opt/lsb/include/fcntl.h:72:1: error: "O_DIRECTORY" redefined
> /opt/lsb/include/fcntl.h:69:1: error: this is the location of the
> previous definition
> /opt/lsb/include/fcntl.h:78:1: error: "O_NOFOLLOW" redefined
> /opt/lsb/include/fcntl.h:70:1: error: this is the location of the
> previous definition
>
> I think there's another instance of this situation, on s390 I
> believe, I'll have to find it (s390s are off for the week-end
> so no results to look at for now)
POSIX_FADV_DONTNEED and POSIX_FADV_NOREUSE.
These are fixed up now.
More information about the lsb-infrastructure
mailing list