[Lsb-infrastructure] libtodb2 questions

Wichmann, Mats D mats.d.wichmann at intel.com
Wed Jul 16 05:03:17 PDT 2008


Ron Hale-Evans wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 11:57 PM, Denis Silakov <silakov at ispras.ru>
> wrote: 
>> Ron Hale-Evans wrote:
>>> 
>>> I realised my last reply only went to Denis (see below).
>>> 
>>> Mats has now pushed your NSS data to the db. I guess it's time to
>>> narrow down the list of approved interfaces, based on the straw man.
>> 
>> Is the list on the wiki page
>> (http://www.linuxfoundation.org/en/NssPublicFunctions) ok? We are
>> ready to push updates necessary to include all functions from that
>> list with accompanying stuff (headers, types, etc.).
> 
> That list includes everything documented on the Mozilla Wiki, except
> for deprecated interfaces (about half a dozen). It's probably OK to
> push; I think Mats said that fine tuning will have to come from
> testing by building one or more apps against it. These apps would
> theoretically become part of appbat.
> 
>> Another question is about documentation source which will be used as
>> a reference - should LSB directly point to Mozilla's NSS SSL
>> Reference or there will be some other doc?
> 
> There will only be other docs when the LSB implementation of an
> interface differs from Mozilla's. We don't yet know which, if any,
> those will be, so it's probably safe to point at Mozilla for now.

There's always the version skew problem... we'll just have to
be aware of that.  For example, the newly added cairo library
matches a 1.0 level, but by now the upstream documentation refers
to a considerably higher version, so we'll need to make sure the
links are to a stable copy of the docs that match what's in LSB.
Do you know if the NSS docs have "moved on" in this sense?


More information about the lsb-infrastructure mailing list