From mats.d.wichmann at intel.com Fri Jul 1 08:00:50 2005 From: mats.d.wichmann at intel.com (Wichmann, Mats D) Date: Thu Jul 12 13:07:54 2007 Subject: [Lsb-sc] LSB 3.0Final Message-ID: Yesterday, Stuart reminded me of some of the release process that wasn't written down - it now appears at: http://www.linuxbase.org/LSBWiki/ReleaseChecklist under Specification Production There is now an LSB 3.0Final in cvs and on the web. Things are still happening out of order, but please have a look and see if this spec is the one that's ready to go. We had a "conditional" vote, and I want to confirm that this version removes the condition. From mats.d.wichmann at intel.com Thu Jul 7 17:00:11 2005 From: mats.d.wichmann at intel.com (Wichmann, Mats D) Date: Thu Jul 12 13:07:54 2007 Subject: [Lsb-sc] Futures project lead Message-ID: Steering Committee: Matt is going to step back from running the futures calls and acting as lead, and Art has volunteered to step in. I don't have any problem with him picking up and doing the work; to formally pick up the title of "Futures Lead" as well as join this body, however, requires an SC vote. What do you all think? From nick at usenix.org Thu Jul 7 17:36:45 2005 From: nick at usenix.org (Nick Stoughton) Date: Thu Jul 12 13:07:54 2007 Subject: [Lsb-sc] Futures project lead In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1120783004.22969.1221.camel@collie> On Thu, 2005-07-07 at 17:00, Wichmann, Mats D wrote: > Steering Committee: > > Matt is going to step back from running the > futures calls and acting as lead, and Art > has volunteered to step in. > > I don't have any problem with him picking up > and doing the work; to formally pick up the title > of "Futures Lead" as well as join this body, > however, requires an SC vote. > Given that there are no other candidates present, and he is well qualified, I approve. > What do you all think? > > _______________________________________________ > Lsb-sc mailing list > Lsb-sc@mail.freestandards.org > http://mail.freestandards.org/mailman/listinfo/lsb-sc From rajesh.banginwar at intel.com Fri Jul 8 08:55:29 2005 From: rajesh.banginwar at intel.com (Banginwar, Rajesh) Date: Thu Jul 12 13:07:54 2007 Subject: [Lsb-sc] Futures project lead Message-ID: Same for me. > -----Original Message----- > From: lsb-sc-bounces@base3.freestandards.org [mailto:lsb-sc- > bounces@base3.freestandards.org] On Behalf Of Nick Stoughton > Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2005 5:37 PM > To: Wichmann, Mats D > Cc: lsb-sc@freestandards.org > Subject: Re: [Lsb-sc] Futures project lead > > On Thu, 2005-07-07 at 17:00, Wichmann, Mats D wrote: > > Steering Committee: > > > > Matt is going to step back from running the > > futures calls and acting as lead, and Art > > has volunteered to step in. > > > > I don't have any problem with him picking up > > and doing the work; to formally pick up the title > > of "Futures Lead" as well as join this body, > > however, requires an SC vote. > > > Given that there are no other candidates present, and he is well > qualified, I approve. > > > What do you all think? > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Lsb-sc mailing list > > Lsb-sc@mail.freestandards.org > > http://mail.freestandards.org/mailman/listinfo/lsb-sc > > > _______________________________________________ > Lsb-sc mailing list > Lsb-sc@mail.freestandards.org > http://mail.freestandards.org/mailman/listinfo/lsb-sc From ajosey at rdg.opengroup.org Fri Jul 8 08:57:37 2005 From: ajosey at rdg.opengroup.org (Andrew Josey) Date: Thu Jul 12 13:07:54 2007 Subject: [Lsb-sc] Futures project lead In-Reply-To: Banginwar, Rajesh's message as of Jul 8, 8:55am. References: Message-ID: <1050708155736.ZM16824@skye.rdg.opengroup.org> Yes , approve regards Andrew From heffler at us.ibm.com Fri Jul 8 09:22:12 2005 From: heffler at us.ibm.com (Marvin Heffler) Date: Thu Jul 12 13:07:54 2007 Subject: [Lsb-sc] Futures project lead In-Reply-To: Message-ID: I think it's okay to have Art take over as futures lead, but I would like to see HP still actively participating in the workgroup so it won't look like the steering committee is only FSG, Intel, and IBM. Regards, Marvin Heffler Linux Standard Base IBM Linux Technology Center 11501 Burnet Road, Zip 905-7A017 Austin, TX 78758 (512) 838-0953 T/L 678-0953 lsb-sc-bounces@base3.freestandards.org wrote on 07/07/2005 07:00:11 PM: > Steering Committee: > > Matt is going to step back from running the > futures calls and acting as lead, and Art > has volunteered to step in. > > I don't have any problem with him picking up > and doing the work; to formally pick up the title > of "Futures Lead" as well as join this body, > however, requires an SC vote. > > What do you all think? > > _______________________________________________ > Lsb-sc mailing list > Lsb-sc@mail.freestandards.org > http://mail.freestandards.org/mailman/listinfo/lsb-sc -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/lsb-sc/attachments/20050708/881d57fc/attachment.htm From mats.d.wichmann at intel.com Fri Jul 8 19:32:27 2005 From: mats.d.wichmann at intel.com (Wichmann, Mats D) Date: Thu Jul 12 13:07:54 2007 Subject: [Lsb-sc] 3.0 specification approval Message-ID: Guys, ignore this - this was old mail caught in the "not a subscriber" net, Nick already reposted from the address he's subscribed under. >-----Original Message----- >From: lsb-sc-bounces@base3.freestandards.org >[mailto:lsb-sc-bounces@base3.freestandards.org] On Behalf Of >Nick Stoughton >Sent: Monday, June 27, 2005 10:11 AM >To: Andrew Josey >Cc: Wichmann, Mats D; lsb-sc@freestandards.org >Subject: Re: [Lsb-sc] 3.0 specification approval > >On Sun, 2005-06-26 at 22:34, Andrew Josey wrote: >> Mats >> Sorry I did not vote, it was the weekend for me and I did >> not have the cycles to look at the document during that time. >> I've also seen checkins to cvs after the vote started, does >> that mean another rebuild? >No ... these are post 3.0 checkins I found while processing the ISO >ballots. They are destined for 3.1 (unless we do need another rebuild >for any other reason). The vote is/was on the document as posted. >> >> Could you look also at why the Copyright acknowledgement >> has the IEEE and The Open Group listed. I'm bound to be asked >> about that at some point. >> >Good point ... I added these at some point in the past when it looked >like we had some text from POSIX, but I don't think this is the case. >However, it certainly wouldn't hurt to get a formal copyright release >set up if we can. > >> thanks >> Andrew >> >-- >Nick >> _______________________________________________ >> Lsb-sc mailing list >> Lsb-sc@mail.freestandards.org >> http://mail.freestandards.org/mailman/listinfo/lsb-sc > > >_______________________________________________ >Lsb-sc mailing list >Lsb-sc@mail.freestandards.org >http://mail.freestandards.org/mailman/listinfo/lsb-sc > From mats.d.wichmann at intel.com Sat Jul 9 17:27:49 2005 From: mats.d.wichmann at intel.com (Wichmann, Mats D) Date: Thu Jul 12 13:07:54 2007 Subject: [Lsb-sc] RE: Futures project lead Message-ID: It ended up being agreed that we should wait on this for a few weeks. I'll resubmit the request at that time. -- mats >Steering Committee: > >Matt is going to step back from running the >futures calls and acting as lead, and Art >has volunteered to step in. > >I don't have any problem with him picking up >and doing the work; to formally pick up the title >of "Futures Lead" as well as join this body, >however, requires an SC vote. > >What do you all think? >