[packaging] Meeting next week to discuss trusted third-party repositories

[Jeff Johnson]

On Dec 27, 2008, at 11:53 AM, Dan Kegel wrote:

>
> I hope those folks post here soon.

Clearly I'm not one of "those folks".

But unless someone willing to speak for LSB (Mats posting
here was carefully noted) willing to set well-defined
"standard" deliverables (the only recent proposal is
"The Berlin API" which lacks an implementation 2+ years
later), the LSB packaging "standard" -- whatever that means --
just isn't going to make progress.

Its all about specification. One could hope for "open",
but I'll personally settle for specified.

73 de Jeff
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4664 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/packaging/attachments/20081227/2775d8b7/attachment.bin