[Printing-architecture] Thursday Oct 9th Architecture meeting minutes
Claudia Alimpich
alimpich at us.ibm.com
Thu Oct 9 16:16:39 PDT 2003
Participants:
Ira McDonald
Glen Petrie
Claudia Alimpich
Ira gave a summary of this week's PWG meetings being held in NY. JobX, Page
overrides, and Document specs passed last call except for a few minor
documentation fixes. Semantic Model and Schema will go to last call soon,
but direction is correct. PSI made it through last call. WBMM meeting went
all day and was very productive. PWG Process spec was reviewed.
We talked about what license we should include in the specifications that
the FSG Open Print working groups are producing. Ira suggested that the
IETF copyright be used for the JTAPI Spec. Here it is:
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2003). All Rights Reserved.
This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to
others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it
or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published
and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any
kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are
included on all such copies and derivative works. However, this
document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing
the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other
Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of
developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for
copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be
followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than
English.
The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be
revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns.
This document and the information contained herein is provided on an
"AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING
TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING
BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION
HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
We talked about the use cases that still need to be created. Should we
include a variable data use case? We decided that the job ticket would not
look any different for a variable data job than for a non-variable data
job. What should the use case for production print include? Should the
production print use case include things like stuffng envelopes? We talked
about specifying workflow in a job ticket and how far we want to take this
in FSG Open Print. We decided that we should definitely make sure that the
scope is reasonable at least for the initial implementations.
The next meeting is Thursday October 16th. We will finish up reviewing the
Mobile Print use case, which we decided should probably become the PDA
Print use case. Next we need to start working on the other use cases.
More information about the Printing-architecture
mailing list