[patch 00/21] Xen-paravirt: Xen guest implementation for
paravirt_ops interface
Christoph Lameter
clameter at sgi.com
Fri Feb 16 13:13:43 PST 2007
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007, Zachary Amsden wrote:
> For the most part, it doesn't disturb VMware or KVM. Xen does need some
> additional functionality in paravirt-ops because they took a different design
> choice - direct page tables instead of shadow page tables. This is where all
> the requirements for the new Xen paravirt-ops hooks come from.
It still seems to be implemented for Xen and not to support a variety of
page table methods in paravirt ops.
More information about the Virtualization
mailing list