[PATCH 08/34] asm-generic: smp_store_mb should use smp_mb

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Wednesday 30 December 2015 22:30:38 Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 02:44:21PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Wednesday 30 December 2015 15:24:47 Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:

> > >  #ifndef smp_store_mb
> > > -#define smp_store_mb(var, value)  do { WRITE_ONCE(var, value); mb(); } while (0)
> > > +#define smp_store_mb(var, value)  do { WRITE_ONCE(var, value); smp_mb(); } while (0)
> > >  #endif
> > >  
> > >  #ifndef smp_mb__before_atomic
> > > 
> > 
> > The same patch is already in the tip tree scheduled for 4.5 as d5a73cadf3fd
> > ("lcoking/barriers, arch: Use smp barriers in smp_store_release()").
> 
> Sorry which tree do you mean exactly?

$ git log --ancestry-path --oneline --merges d5a73cadf3fd..next/master | tail -n 17
cb17a685bed6 Merge remote-tracking branch 'tip/auto-latest'
f29c2e03f0b3 Merge branch 'x86/urgent'
8cd6990bf71d Merge branch 'x86/platform'
0541d92a5eb4 Merge branch 'x86/mm'
aa7c8013c8c0 Merge branch 'x86/fpu'
fcc9a1bd013c Merge branch 'x86/efi'
e74ef3f60886 Merge branch 'x86/cpu'
44a4f0063508 Merge branch 'x86/cleanups'
28c814578fcf Merge branch 'x86/cache'
d74ff99dada8 Merge branch 'x86/boot'
db3c55380b10 Merge branch 'x86/asm'
7cd91b91da20 Merge branch 'x86/apic'
7bfc343947e6 Merge branch 'timers/core'
1720bbcb66d1 Merge branch 'sched/core'
af9a59f26764 Merge branch 'ras/core'
984b85eca78d Merge branch 'perf/core'
d2b22d438aab Merge branch 'locking/core'

$ grep auto-latest Next/Trees 
tip             git     git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git#auto-latest

So locking/core of tip.git has the patch and gets merged into linux-next
through auto-latest in tip.git.

> > I think you can drop your version.
> > 
> >       arnd
> 
> Will drop mine, thanks.
> I kind of dislike that if I just drop it, some arches will temporarily
> regress to a slower implementation.
> I think I can just cherry-pick d5a73cadf3fd into my tree: git
> normally figures such duplicates out nicely.
> Does this sound good?

I don't think there is a perfect solution, you can either cherry-pick
it and get a duplicate commit in the git history, or you merge in the
whole locking/core branch from tip.

I'd say ask Ingo/PeterZ/Davidlohr which way they prefer.

	Arnd